What does one TRILLION dollars look like?
Posted by waremock on Thursday Mar 26, 2009 Under UncategorizedAll this talk about “stimulus packages” and “bailouts”…
A billion dollars…
A hundred billion dollars…
Eight hundred billion dollars…
One TRILLION dollars…
What does that look like? I mean, these various numbers are tossed around like so many doggie treats.We’ll start with a $100 dollar bill. Currently the largest U.S. denomination in general circulation. Most everyone has seen them, slighty fewer have owned them. Guaranteed to make friends wherever they go.

A packet of one hundred $100 bills is less than 1/2″ thick and contains $10,000. Fits in your pocket easily and is more than enough for week or two of shamefully decadent fun.

Believe it or not, this next little pile is $1 million dollars (100 packets of $10,000). You could stuff that into a grocery bag and walk around with it.

While a measly $1 million looked a little unimpressive, $100 million is a little more respectable. It fits neatly on a standard pallet…

And $1 BILLION dollars… now we’re really getting somewhere…

Next we’ll look at ONE TRILLION dollars. This is that number we’ve been hearing so much about. What is a trillion dollars? Well, it’s a million million. It’s a thousand billion. It’s a one followed by 12 zeros.
You ready for this?
It’s pretty surprising.
Go ahead…
Scroll down…Ladies and gentlemen… I give you $1 trillion dollars…

(And notice those pallets are double stacked.)
So the next time you hear someone toss around the phrase “trillion dollars”… that’s what they’re talking about.
How much time does it take you to address an envelope? That’s all the time it will take you to make a big impression on the President concerning abortion. On March 31st, Americans all across the country who oppose abortion will be mailing red envelopes to President Obama.
Here is what I would like you to do:
Get a red envelope. You can buy them at Kinkos, or at party supply stores. On the front, address it to:
President Barack Hussein Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.
Washington , D.C. 20500
On the back, write the following message.
This envelope represents one child who died in abortion. It is empty because that life was unable to offer anything to the world. Responsibility begins with conception.
Put it in the mail on March 31st, and send it. Then send this website to every one of your friends who you think would send one too. I wish we could send 50 million red envelopes, one for every child who died before having a a chance to live. Maybe it will change the heart of the president.
The beauty of Mathematics
Posted by waremock on Friday Mar 20, 2009 Under Education, Great Videos, Just for FunJudge orders homeschoolers into public district classrooms
Read the complete story @ http://www.hsinjustice.com/
Also Story is featured on World Net Daily Website
Facts of the Case
On Friday, March 6th 2009, North Carolina judge Ned Mangum presided over the case of Venessa Mills, and gave the following orders:
1. Three homeschooled children, who tested at grade level and two grades above, must be sent to public school.
2. The children’s Christian beliefs, as taught by their mother, were to be deliberately “challenged” by their public education.
3. The children’s mother was not given enough financial support to allow her to continue homeschooling, or even to adequately survive in the family home.
4. The children were burdened with a visitation schedule of equally divided time, while the mother temporarily continued to homeschool them, creating a completely unworkable and disruptive environment.
5. (The judge’s intent from the beginning was to force these parents back together and out of his courtroom, acting like a liberal-biased marriage counselor instead of being a judge.)
6. The children’s father, a confessed adulterer, was given freedom to stay at the family home indefinitely while continuing to play tennis with his mistress. His crime of adultery was rewarded, rather than censured.
7. The children’s mother’s conservative Christian beliefs were deliberately attacked and slandered by the opposing attorney, and she was accused of being brainwashed for simply upholding the truths of the Bible.
8. Despite a complete lack of evidence, she was punished with a mental health evaluation – while the judge deliberately exposed her to the continued emotional trauma of her adulterous husband living with her and her children.
9. The children’s father was granted his request for the children to go to public school, the minimum level of financial support, and – with no official order to leave the home – was, in effect, given complete freedom to dictate property settlement and terms before moving out.
10. A home evaluation is to be carried out – most likely after the children’s public school starts, and still in the midst of their parent’s divorce, a disruptive visitation schedule, and their mother’s financial hardship. The judge knows this is a recipe for failure, for which the mother will be blamed.
This is a prima facie case of injustice and prejudice. It’s not about conservatives versus liberals – we wouldn’t even want liberals to be treated this way.



